Connect with us

Government

Why Do Most Filipinos Support President Rodrigo Duterte Till Now?

mm

Published

5 years ago

on

Why Do Most Filipinos Support President Rodrigo Duterte Till Now? - Alon Calinao Dy

This is a question I always ask to myself. Why do many Filipinos still support the very simple and truly honest Mayor Rodrigo Duterte? Every time my bashers told me, “Mr. Alon Calinao Dy, you’re a Dutertard!” It simply means a fanatic of the President. Well, I truly appreciate his strong commitment for the Filipinos and for this country.

Like most common Filipinos, I admired President Duterte for being simple, brave and honest leader of this country. He risked his life for the Filipinos who supported him and for making Philippines a better place for everyone and by battling against oligarchs and powerful families who controlled illegal drugs, criminalities and rampant corruption in this country. Who would do these courageous acts? only President Duterte!

This is a wonderful quote of former President Ferdinand Marcos when he was still alive, “no matter how strong and dedicated a leader may be, he must find root and strength amongst the people. He alone cannot save the nation. He may guide, he may set the tone, he may dedicate himself and risk his life, but only the people may save themselves.”

Advertisement

I love this popular quote because it just shows that even though we have an outstanding president right now who cares for the Filipino people, it’s not enough without lasting peace and unity among ourselves. President Duterte is one person, he may be the powerful person in the country, but his real power comes from Filipinos who voted and supported him.

Duterte can inspire everyone to do good things. But it’s up for every Filipino if they’re willing to change for the better. And no matter how good you are to people, it doesn’t matter to them and there will be always people criticizing you. That’s why this quote is true “you can’t please everyone.” But all you have to do is continue what you think is right for the country.

I just don’t understand why the opposition HATE president Duterte so much. HATE is such a strong word that destroys us all. I asked myself, why would you hate a man who risked his life for the good of this country? Why would you hate a simple and honest person like the president? And, why would you hate a man who fought illegal drugs, criminalities and corruption?

If only social media existed before, truth could save us all than the lies spread faster on some TV networks. The moment I watched some TV news in the Philippines who had spreading ‘fake news’ and propaganda against the president, I stopped watching the news as it only divided Filipinos politically.

Advertisement

The truth is, The Real Change is in you…The Real Power is in your hands. Altogether You can change the Nation. Sad but inevitable truth, President Duterte will soon retire and out of the office. But after many years from now, aside from other excellent jobs, Filipinos will always remember him for his ‘Build, Build, Build,’ project as could become his legacy for sure.

from: Alon Calinao Dy

Advertisement

Comments

comments

Related Topics:
Advertisement
Comments

Government

Marcos Jr. Desperate Move Using Politics to Silence Duterte and Secure His Power and Dynasty – Opinyon

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 15, 2025

By

The Battle Beyond Justice

The recent political landscape in the Philippines exposes a harsh reality—this is not about justice but pure political maneuvering. President Bongbong Marcos’ senatorial slate suffered humiliating defeats, signaling a weakening grip on power. Meanwhile, former President Rodrigo Duterte remains a dominant figure, loved by millions, and seen as the strongest political rival Marcos faces today.

With the looming ICC case against Duterte, it’s impossible to ignore the deeper political agenda at play. The attempt to prosecute him isn’t just about seeking justice—it’s about eliminating him from the equation. Marcos and his allies know that as long as Duterte holds influence, he threatens their political dynasty. By removing him from the scene, they pave the way for their own continuity, ensuring that the next Marcos heir takes over.

A Popular Leader vs. A Fading Dynasty

Despite relentless attacks, Duterte’s popularity remains unshaken. His strongman leadership, no-nonsense policies, and connection with the masses continue to define his presence in Philippine politics. Wherever he goes, massive crowds welcome him—a clear indication that the people have not abandoned him.

Advertisement

This is what threatens Marcos the most. Unlike Duterte, whose influence is built on genuine public support, Marcos struggles to solidify his base. The recent electoral losses of his allies reflect this vulnerability. And so, instead of competing fairly, the strategy shifts to using international bodies and legal cases to discredit and possibly remove Duterte altogether.

Weaponizing the ICC for Political Gain

It is undeniable that the ICC investigation resurfaced at a convenient time—just as political tension between the Marcos and Duterte camps intensified. The case is being used as a tool to neutralize Duterte, ensuring that he cannot interfere with the future plans of the Marcos political dynasty. If successful, it could sideline Duterte’s influence before the next elections, leaving Marcos with a clearer path to securing power for his successors.

This isn’t about justice. If it were, why isn’t Marcos held accountable for the injustices of his own family’s past? Why does the ICC’s interest conveniently align with the political ambitions of the current administration? These questions expose the hypocrisy behind the case against Duterte.

Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro confirmed that the Office of the President paid for the private jet that transported former President Rodrigo Duterte to The Hague, Netherlands.

Advertisement

According to Atty. Claire Castro, this was part of the Philippine government’s full cooperation in executing the arrest. However, many question why Marcos went beyond merely following ICC orders, considering that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the Philippines. Without the Philippine government’s cooperation, it would have been difficult for the ICC to arrest Duterte—just as it has been unable to act on its cases against Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli leaders.

Atty. Reserva pointed out the inconsistency, stating, “We fight for our fellow Filipinos abroad to protect them when they face criminal charges. Yet in the case of FPRRD, he has not even been convicted in our country, and we are surrendering him just like that?”

#marcos, #bongbongmarcos, #duterte, #duterteicc, #rodrigoduterte

Advertisement

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

Ang Pagtataksil sa mga Mamamayang Pilipino: Ang Papel ni Marcos sa Pag-turnover kay Duterte sa ICC

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 12, 2025

By

Ang kamakailang pagkaka-aresto kay dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte ay nagdulot ng matinding kontrobersiya at nagbukas ng mga mahahalagang tanong ukol sa papel ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas, lalo na ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos, sa pakikipagtulungan sa International Criminal Court (ICC). Bagamat nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa ICC noong 2019, ang desisyon ni Marcos na ibigay si Duterte sa ICC ay itinuturing ng marami bilang isang pagtataksil sa mga mamamayang Pilipino. Dito, tatalakayin natin kung bakit ang hakbang na ito ay hindi lamang paglabag sa soberanya ng Pilipinas kundi pati na rin isang pagsuway sa mga batas ng bansa.

1️⃣ Wala nang Jurisdiksyon ang ICC sa Pilipinas

Katotohanan: Nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa ICC noong 2019.
Noong 2019, nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa International Criminal Court (ICC) matapos pagbatikos ng administrasyon ni Pangulong Duterte ang mga imbestigasyon ukol sa war on drugs. Dahil dito, wala nang legal na hurisdiksyon ang ICC sa bansa, kaya’t hindi na dapat tinanggap o pinansin ang mga arrest warrant mula sa ICC.

Ngunit sa kabila ng ito, pinili ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ibigay si Duterte sa kanila. Walang obligasyon ang Pilipinas na tanggapin o ipatupad ang arrest order mula sa ICC, ngunit ang mga hakbang ni Marcos ay nagpapakita ng pagpapahalaga sa internasyonal na presyon kaysa sa mga karapatan ng mga mamamayan ng Pilipinas.

Advertisement

2️⃣ Ang Kahilingan ni Bongbong Marcos ang Nagbigay daan sa Aresto

Katotohanan: Hindi maaaring maglabas ng warrant ang ICC nang walang kooperasyon ng isang bansa.
Ang ICC ay walang kapangyarihang pilitin ang isang bansa na arestuhin ang isang tao maliban kung ang gobyerno ng nasabing bansa ay kusang-loob na makipagtulungan. Ibig sabihin, hindi maaaring maglabas ng arrest warrant ang ICC para kay Duterte kung hindi pumayag ang gobyerno ng Pilipinas. Ang desisyon ni Marcos na ibigay si Duterte sa ICC ay isang malinaw na pagpapakita ng pagpili na makipagtulungan sa mga internasyonal na utos, at iprayoridad ang mga interes mula sa labas kaysa sa mga karapatang dapat ipagtanggol ng gobyernong Pilipino.

Ang kooperasyong ito ay hindi isang pangangailangan, kundi isang desisyon na ginawa ng Pangulo, at ipinapakita nito kung paano pinili ni Marcos ang mas malakas na internasyonal na impluwensiya kaysa sa ating mga sariling batas.

3️⃣ Pagkakaila sa Korte Suprema at mga Batas ng Pilipinas

Katotohanan: Naglabas ng Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) ang Korte Suprema.
Sa isang hakbang na tinuturing na paglabag sa rule of law, ang administrasyon ni Marcos ay nagpasya na ipagwalang-bahala ang isang Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) na inilabas ng Korte Suprema kaugnay sa aresto ni Duterte. Ang TRO na ito ay nilayon upang magbigay ng legal na proteksyon at hadlangan ang anumang padalos-dalos na aksyon, ngunit ang gobyerno ay nagpatuloy sa pag-turnover kay Duterte, pinapalampas ang proseso ng legalidad.

Ang sistema ng katarungan sa Pilipinas ay hindi pinansin, at ang desisyon na makipagtulungan sa ICC ay isang malinaw na paglabag sa ating mga sariling batas, na nagpapakita ng isang hindi tamang pagpapahalaga sa ating soberanya at kalayaan bilang isang bansa.

Advertisement

4️⃣ Isang Pagtataksil sa mga Mamamayang Pilipino

Katotohanan: Dapat ipagtanggol ng gobyerno ang mga karapatan ng mamamayan.
Sa pagpili ni Pangulong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ipasa si Duterte sa kanila, ito ay itinuturing ng marami bilang isang pagtataksil sa mga mamamayang Pilipino. Ang pangunahing tungkulin ng gobyerno ay protektahan ang mga karapatan ng mamamayan, ngunit sa pagkakataong ito, pinili nilang makipagtulungan sa ICC nang hindi tinitingnan ang ating soberanya at mga batas.

Ang hakbang na ito ay nagpapahina sa gobyerno ng Pilipinas at sistema ng katarungan, at ipinapakita na ang administrasyon ni Marcos ay mas pinahahalagahan ang internasyonal na presyon kaysa sa kaligtasan at proteksyon ng mga mamamayang Pilipino. Ang desisyon na ito ay nag-iiwan ng maraming tanong ukol sa tunay na layunin ng administrasyong ito at kung sino ang talagang nakikinabang sa desisyong ito.

🚨 Ano ang Ibig Sabihin ng Hakbang na Ito para sa Soberanya ng Pilipinas?

Ang desisyon na ipasa si Duterte sa ICC ay nagpapakita ng isang malupit na pagkawala ng soberanya para sa Pilipinas. Nagdudulot ito ng takot sa hinaharap ng ating bansa, kung saan maaaring maging karaniwan na ang gobyerno na pinamumunuan ni Pangulong Marcos ay magpapasailalim sa mga internasyonal na utos at pagpapasya nang walang malasakit sa ating mga sariling batas at interes. Ang sitwasyong ito ay isang senyales ng pagtanggi sa kapangyarihan ng ating bansa at pagpapalakas ng impluwensiya ng mga banyagang kapangyarihan sa ating mga desisyon.

👉 Dapat Magtanong ang mga Pilipino: Ano ang Nangyari sa ating Soberanya?

Dapat tanungin ng mga Pilipino: Ano ang nangyari sa ating soberanya? Bakit ang gobyerno ay mabilis na makipagtulungan sa ICC at mga banyagang requests, ngunit tahimik sa mga lokal na isyu tulad ng kurapsyon, smuggling, at krimen? Ang sitwasyong ito ay nagpapakita ng hindi tamang prayoridad ng kasalukuyang administrasyon, at ang mga mamamayan ay nararapat na magtanong kung paano makikinabang ang bansa sa desisyong ito.

Advertisement

Konklusyon:
Ang desisyon ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ipasa si dating Pangulong Duterte sa kanila ay isang malupit na paglabag sa soberanya ng Pilipinas. Pinapakita nito ang isang hindi tamang pagpapahalaga sa ating sariling mga batas at sistema ng katarungan, at isang pagsuway sa mga mamamayang Pilipino na nararapat na protektahan ng kanilang gobyerno. Dapat tanungin ng mga Pilipino ang mga tunay na motibo ng administrasyong ito at humingi ng mga sagot tungkol sa kung paano makikinabang ang bansa mula sa hakbang na ito.

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

The Political Motives Behind Duterte’s Arrest

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 11, 2025

By

The recent arrest of former President Rodrigo Duterte, under the cooperation of the Philippine government with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Interpol, has sparked controversy. While the arrest was portrayed as an act of justice, there are several reasons to believe that this is more about politics than legality. Here are five key points to consider regarding the circumstances of his arrest.

1️⃣ Interpol Has No Power to Enforce Arrests

Fact: Interpol is not a law enforcement agency.
While Interpol can issue notices, it does not have the authority to arrest individuals. Interpol’s role is purely advisory, providing information and issuing alerts to law enforcement agencies across countries. It is up to the individual governments to decide whether or not to act on these notices. The Philippine government’s decision to comply with the arrest request was a political move, not a legal obligation.

2️⃣ The ICC Has No Jurisdiction Over the Philippines

Fact: The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019.
In 2019, the Philippines officially withdrew from the International Criminal Court, meaning that the country is under no legal obligation to recognize or comply with ICC warrants. Duterte’s arrest was not a requirement but a choice made by the current administration. This decision was not based on international law but rather on political motives.

Advertisement

3️⃣ Why Was the ICC Warrant Executed “Hours Before Duterte’s Arrival”?

Fact: The timing raises questions.
If this arrest was truly about seeking justice, why was the ICC warrant issued just hours before Duterte’s arrival and executed so swiftly? In a system that values due process, there should have been a thorough legal review before such drastic measures were taken. The suspicious timing suggests that this may have been a planned political attack rather than a pursuit of justice.

4️⃣ Calling Him “Mr. Duterte” is Pure Disrespect

Fact: Titles matter in a democratic society.
Regardless of one’s political views, former presidents are entitled to be addressed with the respect their office commands. Referring to Duterte as simply “Mr. Duterte” is an intentional act of disrespect. It undermines the dignity of the office he held and exposes the current administration’s personal bias against him. Former leaders should be addressed by their titles as a matter of respect for the office, regardless of their political standing.

5️⃣ Why Comply with Foreign Requests but Ignore Real National Issues?

Fact: Selective obedience is troubling.
The Philippine government quickly complied with the ICC’s request, yet it remains silent on more pressing national issues, such as corruption, smuggling, and local crime. The government’s selective obedience raises a critical question: why is the administration so quick to act on foreign requests, but so slow to tackle real, local issues that affect the daily lives of Filipinos? This selective action only deepens the suspicion that this arrest is politically motivated, not driven by justice.

🚨 This Isn’t About Justice—It’s About Politics

The arrest of former President Duterte appears to be more about political maneuvering than a genuine pursuit of justice. The Philippine government chose to comply with foreign requests while turning a blind eye to local issues that need immediate attention. Duterte’s arrest was a decision made by the current administration, and the people of the Philippines need to question the motivations behind it.

Advertisement

👉 Filipinos Should Ask: Who Really Benefits from Duterte’s Arrest?

The true beneficiaries of this arrest are unclear, but one thing is certain—it’s definitely not the people Duterte fought to protect. Filipinos deserve to understand the political dynamics at play and the true motivations behind this high-profile arrest.

Conclusion:
The arrest of Duterte, under the guise of seeking justice, appears to be driven by political interests rather than legal necessity. Filipinos must look beyond the headlines and ask the hard questions: Why was this arrest so rushed? Why is the government prioritizing forei