Connect with us

Government

Mga naka Freeze na Assets at Accounts ng KAPA hindi sapat na pambayad sa lahat ng miembro

mm

Published

on

Mga naka Freeze na Assets at Accounts ng KAPA hindi sapat na pambayad sa lahat ng miembro

Sa kasalukuyan ang halaga ng ilang mga assets at mga acounts na na freeze ng pamahalan ay umaabot lamang sa 100 million, at itoy hindi sapat upang mabayaran ang mahhigit kumulang na 5 milyong miembro.

2017, matagal ng may warning ang SEC sa KAPA hinggil sa hindi pag submit ng mga documento nito sa pagtayo ng negosyo o cooperatiba.

Ang KAPA ministry ay dating KAPPA (Kabus Padatuon) at ang KAPPA ay hindi naka komply sa mga requirements kaya binabalaan ang mga mamamayan na huwag sumali o makilahok sa ano mang transaksyon lalo na kung ma kaugnayan sa pera.

Dahil sa hindi ito naka komply sa mga documento at requirements, napatigil ito at tila natahimik. Yun pala gumawa ng bagong pangalan si Pastor Joel Apolinario at ginawang KAPA ministry, isang religious ministry dahil dito, hindi ito mamahabol ng SEC dahil ni rehistro bilang simbahan o relihiyon.

Ngunit sa puntong ito, dahil sa sumikat ang ministry ay napag alamang may mga investment na nangyayari kung saan ginawang gatasaan ang mga mamamayan sa personal na adhikain. Sa halip na investment ginawang rason ay donasyon at ang tubo o interest ay ginawang blessings, upang maitago sa SEC ang transactions na ito.

Pinapirma ang mga members na ang lahat ng pera na kanilang ibibigay ay donasyon, at dahil sa donasyon ay may maibabalik na 30% bilang interest o blessings, ngunit hindi ito nakasaad sa kontrata na pinirmahan na tutubo ang iyong donasyon, dahil itoy salita lamang na pwedi umanong maging mahigit pa, at hindi pweding isama sa kontrat dahil itoy labag sa batas bilang investement o financial business.

Sa kasalukuyan, walang habol ang mga miembro dahil donasyon ang kanilang pinirmahan, kahit ibat iba ang relihiyon nila, naipag kalulu nila dahil sumali sila sa KAPA dahil hindi sa relihiyon o pagsamba pero sa perang matatanggap buwan buwan.

Nauto at nasilaw sa salitang mala dios, pero pangluluko ang nasa likod.

Ayon sa SEC, kailangan mag file ng complain at claim ang miembro upang maisama sila sa magiging beneficiary sa mga ari-ariang na freeze o nakumpiska. ngunit hindi ito sapat upang mabayaran ang buong miembro, dahil sa walang security or garantia ang naturang KAPA o financial statement assets o capital bilang pambayad sa mga miembro, dahil ang mga pambayad nito ay mula rin sa mga bagong miembro na nahikayat o na recruit.

 

Comments

comments

Advertisement
Comments

Business

ABS-CBN Franchise Issue: Press Freedom is a Right, Access to a TV Frequency/Platform is a Privilege

mm

Published

on

ABS-CBN Franchise Issue: Press Freedom is a Right, Access to a TV Frequency/Platform is a Privilege

No, the ABS-CBN Franchise Renewal Issue arises not from Free Speech or Press Freedom as defined in the Constitution, but from Public Services as defined in the Public Services Law [0].

That is, the issue is not whether ABS-CBN should have the right to Free Speech (it will always have that right), but whether ABS-CBN should be allowed to use one of a very limited number of TV frequencies available.

Every free-to-air TV or radio station is required to secure a congressional franchise in the form of a Republic Act, a franchise that usually lasts for 25 years [1]. After this period, a network requires a new franchise, a new Republic Act, to continue operations.

ABS-CBN received its latest 25-year congressional franchise on 30 March 1995 via Republic Act No. 7966 [2]. Hence, the network needs to get a new franchise before RA 7966 expires 25 years later on 30 March 2020.

And that’s the problem.

The Philippine Constitution guarantees Press Freedom, but it doesn’t guarantee access to broadcast frequencies because they’re severely limited by Science.

In the case of TV, there are at most 12 available VHF channels (Channels 2, 3, to 13) and at most 38 in the UHF band (Channels 14 to 51) [3].

Reporters sans frontières / Reporters Without Borders / RSF recognizes this reality when it wrote [1]:

“Licensing became necessary as broadcast frequencies constitute a scarce resource… In Metro Manila for example, the frequency is limited to 23 physical spots for TV channels… and they are all taken at the moment.”

The TV firm ABS-CBN, by virtue of Press Freedom, has the right to create and distribute content, but it has no inalienable right to broadcast over the VHF Channel 2 Frequency.

If access to a TV frequency is an inalienable right of every Filipino, then every Filipino should have his own TV channel. Now, how do you divide the 23 TV frequencies in Metro Manila among its over 10 million residents?

That’s impossible, hence the need for Congressional Franchises, meaning the government has the authority to decide which TV broadcaster wannabes are in the best position to serve Public Interest.

ABS-CBN’s dominion over Channel 2 means somebody else didn’t get it, and that dominion is a privilege granted through an Act of Congress.

Even without a Congressional Franchise, ABS-CBN may still broadcast over the internet, syndicate its content, or do pretty much whatever it wants EXCEPT broadcast via VHF/UHF TV frequencies.

In short, the Constitution guarantees Press Freedom, but it DOES NOT guarantee access to TV frequencies.

#####

SOURCES:

[0] Commonwealth Act 146. Public Service Law (as amended, and as modified particularly by PD No. 1, Integrated Reorganization Plan and EO 546). http://bit.ly/2ZN1kL4

[1] Media Ownership Monitor Philippines – Reporters without Borders. How to get a media license. http://bit.ly/2Qq7EFz

[2] Congress of the Philippines. An Act Granting the ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation a Franchise to Construct, Install, Operate and Maintain Television and Radio Broadcasting Stations in the Philippines, and for other purposes. RA No. 7966. 30 March 1995. http://bit.ly/2QKK1WX

[3] Government of the Philippines – Department of Information and Communication Technology. Framework of the Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting (DTTB) Migration Plan. October 2017. page iii. http://bit.ly/35m61N5

(c) Thinking Pinoy

Opinion:

Tita Nepomuceno : Free speech even they’re lies? Free speech even if they confuse the minds of filipinos, rather than enlighten them of the truth? Free speech to destroy the integrity of people they don’t want? Use press freedom to be partial to some sectors? Press freedom to operate and earn insurmountable profit without paying taxes? And here is ABS-CBN crying out that their free speech or press freedom is being supressed? ABS-CBN’s meaning of press freedom is as twisted as the minds of the people running the network.

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

If totoo ang travel Ban, Bakit ang ABS-CBN, GMA, Inquirer at Rappler, can’t provide the Final US House Bill?

mm

Published

on

If totoo ang travel Ban, Bakit ang ABS-CBN, GMA, Inquirer at Rappler, can't provide the Final US House Bill?

Puro lang pamgpagulo ang pina published ng media, especially ABS-CBN, Inquirer at Rappler, bumabasi sa tweet at post ng dalawang US Senador na puro LP at closed kay De Lima, at of course, best friends siguro ni De Lima ang dalawang senator na kanyang taga pangtanggol.

So, puro lang publicity ang ginagawa ng media, para masira ang administrasyong Duterte, so, bakit hindi nila kayang ipakita ang FINAL SIGNED CONGRESS HOUSE BILL NG 2020 BUDGE NG USA.?

Kasi in short wala naman talaga, probbably on the draft na gawa ng dalawang  US Senators Dick Durbin and Patrick Leahy, so nasaan ang final signed house bill?

FYI, mayroon tayong FACT CHECKERS, vera files at rappler, pero wala tahimik sila, kasi wala silang mai provide at hindi nila kayang kalabanin ang kapwa nila media.

Look, vera files, Ellen Tordellas, asking the final signed provisions na e ban ang mga PH officials na dahilan sa pagpapakulong kay de lima.

Senator Leila de Lima said the 2020 US Budget Law (HR 1865, http://bit.ly/2Zy4r9S) references to a certain explanatory statement which would, in turn, confirm that a clause that specifically mentions her is essentially a part of HR 1865.

At kung iisipin natin, dalawang US senator lang at hindi yan papatulan ng ilang US senators, kasi in short, anong paki alam ng ilang US senators sa kaso ni De Lima, dalawang closed friends ni de lima vs, majority US senators, pag aakasayahan pa ba nila si De lima, dahil lang sa dalawang senators?

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, text

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Business

Fact Checkers Rappler at Vera Files Tahimik sa mga Fake News ng mga media hinggil sa #SEAGAMES 

mm

Published

on

Fact Checkers Rappler at Vera Files Tahimik sa mga Fake News  at Misleading news ng Media 

Walang kibo, walang aksyon, tahimik ang Facebook Fact Checkers sa mga kumakalat na mga wrong, misleading, half truth, sensionalized news at mga misleading news ng ABS-CBN, Inquirer, CNN, GMA news at ng iba pang media.

Sa mga kumakalat na mga misleading news, half truth kung saan, marami sa mga ulat ng media na walang katotohanan, at half truth (meaning hindi kumukuha ng buong detalye ng report at hindi kumuha ng ulat sa bawat panig) tulad ng “KIKIAM” bakit hindi sila nag tanong sa Hotel na siyang nag hain ng pagkain, kung kikiam nga ba?

In this case, this is a half truth news, kukunin lamang ang panig ng isang party para ma sensationalize at magkaroon ng negative news at masira ang #SEAGAMES at imahi ng bansa.

Another fake news mula sa isang dating reporter ng ABS-CBN, kung saan naglagay ng caption sa isang photo na kung saan makikita sa photo na ginawang table clothe ang watawat ng ating bansa.

Another fake news ng Inquirer, posting wrong photo na kinuha from Nepal, grabi na panira, maka pag balita at makapanira lang, pwedi namang puntahan ang actual aquatic park na kugn saan gaganapin ang #seagames acquatic competition.

Pero tahimik ang rappler at vera files sa mga fales at misleading news. .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Create your website, blogs or radio station

Trending

Copyright © 2017 hosted by hornhost.com