Connect with us

Government

Sarili nyong Ina hindi niyo kayang mahalin, ang Inang Bayan pa kaya? – Opinyon

mm

Published

on

Sarili nyong Ina hindi niyo kayang mahalin, ang Inang Bayan pa kaya? - Opinyon

Kung totoong makabayan ang mga ralliyista na nagsisigaw para sa kanilang karapatan at kalayaan at para sa bayan, dahil mahal umano nila ang ating bayan na binababoy ng kasalukuyang administrasyon ni Duterte, bakit hindi muna nila e check at tingnan ang kanilang sarili?

Lalo na ang mga Scholars umano ng bayan, na gamit ang kanilang talino at mga karapatan upang maki alam sa usapang pulitika sa bansa at dahil umano sa kanilang ipinaglalaban para sa pagmamahal sa inang bayan, Check muna ang sarili.

Minamahal ba nila ang kanilang sariling Ina?

Kung mahal mo ang iyong sariling Ina diyan natin masasabi na may pagmamahal ka nga, pero paano mo maipakita at mapaparamdam ang pagmamahal sa iyong Ina kung ikaw mismo ay naging suwael?

Lalo na yung estudyante ng PUP na sumama at namundok ng walang paalam sa magulang na halos isang buwang nawawala, hindi ba nila naisip? kung anong klasing pag alala ang mararamdaman ng isang Ina? pag aalala na mawalay sa piliping ng anak ng hindi mo alam kung nasaan at kung anong dahilan? dahil sa maling ideolohiya, tapos ngayon mag sisigawan ang mga raliyista na mahalin at para ipaglaban ang sariling bayan?

Pinglaban ba nila ang pagmamahal ng kanilang Ina para sa kanila?

Mahalin mo ang sarili mong Ina bago mo, sabihing mahal mo ang Inang Bayan!

Opinion –

 

Comments

comments

Advertisement
Comments

Business

ABS-CBN Franchise Issue: Press Freedom is a Right, Access to a TV Frequency/Platform is a Privilege

mm

Published

on

ABS-CBN Franchise Issue: Press Freedom is a Right, Access to a TV Frequency/Platform is a Privilege

No, the ABS-CBN Franchise Renewal Issue arises not from Free Speech or Press Freedom as defined in the Constitution, but from Public Services as defined in the Public Services Law [0].

That is, the issue is not whether ABS-CBN should have the right to Free Speech (it will always have that right), but whether ABS-CBN should be allowed to use one of a very limited number of TV frequencies available.

Every free-to-air TV or radio station is required to secure a congressional franchise in the form of a Republic Act, a franchise that usually lasts for 25 years [1]. After this period, a network requires a new franchise, a new Republic Act, to continue operations.

ABS-CBN received its latest 25-year congressional franchise on 30 March 1995 via Republic Act No. 7966 [2]. Hence, the network needs to get a new franchise before RA 7966 expires 25 years later on 30 March 2020.

And that’s the problem.

The Philippine Constitution guarantees Press Freedom, but it doesn’t guarantee access to broadcast frequencies because they’re severely limited by Science.

In the case of TV, there are at most 12 available VHF channels (Channels 2, 3, to 13) and at most 38 in the UHF band (Channels 14 to 51) [3].

Reporters sans frontières / Reporters Without Borders / RSF recognizes this reality when it wrote [1]:

“Licensing became necessary as broadcast frequencies constitute a scarce resource… In Metro Manila for example, the frequency is limited to 23 physical spots for TV channels… and they are all taken at the moment.”

The TV firm ABS-CBN, by virtue of Press Freedom, has the right to create and distribute content, but it has no inalienable right to broadcast over the VHF Channel 2 Frequency.

If access to a TV frequency is an inalienable right of every Filipino, then every Filipino should have his own TV channel. Now, how do you divide the 23 TV frequencies in Metro Manila among its over 10 million residents?

That’s impossible, hence the need for Congressional Franchises, meaning the government has the authority to decide which TV broadcaster wannabes are in the best position to serve Public Interest.

ABS-CBN’s dominion over Channel 2 means somebody else didn’t get it, and that dominion is a privilege granted through an Act of Congress.

Even without a Congressional Franchise, ABS-CBN may still broadcast over the internet, syndicate its content, or do pretty much whatever it wants EXCEPT broadcast via VHF/UHF TV frequencies.

In short, the Constitution guarantees Press Freedom, but it DOES NOT guarantee access to TV frequencies.

#####

SOURCES:

[0] Commonwealth Act 146. Public Service Law (as amended, and as modified particularly by PD No. 1, Integrated Reorganization Plan and EO 546). http://bit.ly/2ZN1kL4

[1] Media Ownership Monitor Philippines – Reporters without Borders. How to get a media license. http://bit.ly/2Qq7EFz

[2] Congress of the Philippines. An Act Granting the ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation a Franchise to Construct, Install, Operate and Maintain Television and Radio Broadcasting Stations in the Philippines, and for other purposes. RA No. 7966. 30 March 1995. http://bit.ly/2QKK1WX

[3] Government of the Philippines – Department of Information and Communication Technology. Framework of the Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting (DTTB) Migration Plan. October 2017. page iii. http://bit.ly/35m61N5

(c) Thinking Pinoy

Opinion:

Tita Nepomuceno : Free speech even they’re lies? Free speech even if they confuse the minds of filipinos, rather than enlighten them of the truth? Free speech to destroy the integrity of people they don’t want? Use press freedom to be partial to some sectors? Press freedom to operate and earn insurmountable profit without paying taxes? And here is ABS-CBN crying out that their free speech or press freedom is being supressed? ABS-CBN’s meaning of press freedom is as twisted as the minds of the people running the network.

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

If totoo ang travel Ban, Bakit ang ABS-CBN, GMA, Inquirer at Rappler, can’t provide the Final US House Bill?

mm

Published

on

If totoo ang travel Ban, Bakit ang ABS-CBN, GMA, Inquirer at Rappler, can't provide the Final US House Bill?

Puro lang pamgpagulo ang pina published ng media, especially ABS-CBN, Inquirer at Rappler, bumabasi sa tweet at post ng dalawang US Senador na puro LP at closed kay De Lima, at of course, best friends siguro ni De Lima ang dalawang senator na kanyang taga pangtanggol.

So, puro lang publicity ang ginagawa ng media, para masira ang administrasyong Duterte, so, bakit hindi nila kayang ipakita ang FINAL SIGNED CONGRESS HOUSE BILL NG 2020 BUDGE NG USA.?

Kasi in short wala naman talaga, probbably on the draft na gawa ng dalawang  US Senators Dick Durbin and Patrick Leahy, so nasaan ang final signed house bill?

FYI, mayroon tayong FACT CHECKERS, vera files at rappler, pero wala tahimik sila, kasi wala silang mai provide at hindi nila kayang kalabanin ang kapwa nila media.

Look, vera files, Ellen Tordellas, asking the final signed provisions na e ban ang mga PH officials na dahilan sa pagpapakulong kay de lima.

Senator Leila de Lima said the 2020 US Budget Law (HR 1865, http://bit.ly/2Zy4r9S) references to a certain explanatory statement which would, in turn, confirm that a clause that specifically mentions her is essentially a part of HR 1865.

At kung iisipin natin, dalawang US senator lang at hindi yan papatulan ng ilang US senators, kasi in short, anong paki alam ng ilang US senators sa kaso ni De Lima, dalawang closed friends ni de lima vs, majority US senators, pag aakasayahan pa ba nila si De lima, dahil lang sa dalawang senators?

Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, text

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Business

Fact Checkers Rappler at Vera Files Tahimik sa mga Fake News ng mga media hinggil sa #SEAGAMES 

mm

Published

on

Fact Checkers Rappler at Vera Files Tahimik sa mga Fake News  at Misleading news ng Media 

Walang kibo, walang aksyon, tahimik ang Facebook Fact Checkers sa mga kumakalat na mga wrong, misleading, half truth, sensionalized news at mga misleading news ng ABS-CBN, Inquirer, CNN, GMA news at ng iba pang media.

Sa mga kumakalat na mga misleading news, half truth kung saan, marami sa mga ulat ng media na walang katotohanan, at half truth (meaning hindi kumukuha ng buong detalye ng report at hindi kumuha ng ulat sa bawat panig) tulad ng “KIKIAM” bakit hindi sila nag tanong sa Hotel na siyang nag hain ng pagkain, kung kikiam nga ba?

In this case, this is a half truth news, kukunin lamang ang panig ng isang party para ma sensationalize at magkaroon ng negative news at masira ang #SEAGAMES at imahi ng bansa.

Another fake news mula sa isang dating reporter ng ABS-CBN, kung saan naglagay ng caption sa isang photo na kung saan makikita sa photo na ginawang table clothe ang watawat ng ating bansa.

Another fake news ng Inquirer, posting wrong photo na kinuha from Nepal, grabi na panira, maka pag balita at makapanira lang, pwedi namang puntahan ang actual aquatic park na kugn saan gaganapin ang #seagames acquatic competition.

Pero tahimik ang rappler at vera files sa mga fales at misleading news. .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

comments

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Create your website, blogs or radio station

Trending

Copyright © 2017 hosted by hornhost.com