Connect with us

Government

The Toledo Panic Button Doctrine in the West Philippine Sea

mm

Published

7 years ago

on

The Toledo Panic Button Doctrine in the West Philippine Sea

The Roman Empire did it. The British Empire copied it in style. The Empire of Chaos has always done it. They all do it. “Divide et impera.” Divide and rule – or divide and conquer. It’s nasty, brutish and effective. Not forever though, like diamonds, because empires do crumble (–Pepe Escobar-). And the Great American Empire too did it in the Philippines. –Delmar T. Taclibon-

The long been flouted friendship between the Philippines and the United States of America will be put to a test anew even not a single struggle or territorial claims we had was supported by our so called Big Brother is evident. Remember our claims for Sabah or East Borneo; it was dissuaded by no other than one of the Great American Empire’s best Presidents – John F. Kennedy. The influence of Great Britain cannot be of course traded off to ours in lieu of the great powers of the West in Southeast Asia.

Southeast Asia has not escaped the impact of globalization, both colonial and corporate. As Europeans expanded their colonial activities, they made their way into Southeast Asia. Southeast Asia is heavily influenced by European colonialism. The only area of the region that was not colonized by the Europeans was Thailand, which was called Siam during the colonial era. It remained an independent kingdom throughout the colonial period and was a buffer state between French and British colonizers. In as much, Japanese colonial empire controlled much of Southeast Asia before World War II.

Advertisement

In the case of Micronesia, Marianas and Guam, our so called bosom friend drew the line in the Pacific that we are not supposed to lay claim with the flimsy reason that those Islands are War Booties and war plunders. We have to bear in mind that the group of islands were part and parcel of the Philippines under Spain since colonial times. The administration of these islands was drawn out of the sweat, blood, and tears of native Filipinos they call Indios in that epoch.

In the West Philippine Sea, a vital shipping route through which $5 trillion of trade passes every year. Not to set aside the presence of vast Hydro Carbon deposit, an extension of the Malampaya Oil rig exploration that is within our legitimate territory. The United State of America signified intentions to deploy her fire-power and might via Pentagon sending U.S. military aircraft and ships to assert freedom of navigation around growing Chinese-made artificial islands or just a form of “Toledo Panic Button?”

Is the Philippines a mere country to exploit by the Great Powers and is the United States of America a friend or foe? Considering that those who now extracting oil in the West Philippine Sea Oil Basin are the same people who owns Petro China, Russia’s Yukos, Dutch Shell, Aramco and others (The Owner of N M Rothschild & Sons, Petro China, Aramco, Dutch Shell, AIG, Petron Phil., Ashmore, Yukos of Russia, Lynch, Morgan Stanley, J P Morgan, Goldman Sachs and many other controlling Oil Corporations). The United States of America and the People’s Republic of China are but Con-Artists and the former is playing the “Toledo Panic Button?

What is the “Toledo Panic Button?”

Advertisement

When you shoot your cohort to prove you’re not in working together, or pretend to wage war against an intruder or encroacher of a friend’s territory in the act that you are in fact working with that intruder. It is a Con-artist pretending to turn on each other in-order to dupe those whom they pretentiously call friend.

Richard Rovair used the old Toledo Panic Button tactic and shot his friend then pretended to give chase when the Mob Boss caught them stealing. Lucky for his friend it was only a flesh wound.

China didn’t almost get slightly shot by accident. USA pulled a “Toledo Panic Button” on him when the Philippines found China and USA inside their territory clandestinely, and their expensive possessions being stolen. USA said he sensed a strange activity of China, went to check it out, and saw China stealing. The Philippines think USA is a hero now and his cohort China is a villain when in fact they are both scoundrels.

“It is now your most sensible judgment that must prevail and my judgment should
be wrong instead, God save the Philippines.”

Advertisement

Dr. Delmar Topinio Taclibon, Bt., DKR, KRSS, BSCE, MBA, Phd.D.A., May 17, 2015

Comments

comments

Related Topics:
Advertisement
Comments

Government

Marcos Jr. Desperate Move Using Politics to Silence Duterte and Secure His Power and Dynasty – Opinyon

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 15, 2025

By

The Battle Beyond Justice

The recent political landscape in the Philippines exposes a harsh reality—this is not about justice but pure political maneuvering. President Bongbong Marcos’ senatorial slate suffered humiliating defeats, signaling a weakening grip on power. Meanwhile, former President Rodrigo Duterte remains a dominant figure, loved by millions, and seen as the strongest political rival Marcos faces today.

With the looming ICC case against Duterte, it’s impossible to ignore the deeper political agenda at play. The attempt to prosecute him isn’t just about seeking justice—it’s about eliminating him from the equation. Marcos and his allies know that as long as Duterte holds influence, he threatens their political dynasty. By removing him from the scene, they pave the way for their own continuity, ensuring that the next Marcos heir takes over.

A Popular Leader vs. A Fading Dynasty

Despite relentless attacks, Duterte’s popularity remains unshaken. His strongman leadership, no-nonsense policies, and connection with the masses continue to define his presence in Philippine politics. Wherever he goes, massive crowds welcome him—a clear indication that the people have not abandoned him.

Advertisement

This is what threatens Marcos the most. Unlike Duterte, whose influence is built on genuine public support, Marcos struggles to solidify his base. The recent electoral losses of his allies reflect this vulnerability. And so, instead of competing fairly, the strategy shifts to using international bodies and legal cases to discredit and possibly remove Duterte altogether.

Weaponizing the ICC for Political Gain

It is undeniable that the ICC investigation resurfaced at a convenient time—just as political tension between the Marcos and Duterte camps intensified. The case is being used as a tool to neutralize Duterte, ensuring that he cannot interfere with the future plans of the Marcos political dynasty. If successful, it could sideline Duterte’s influence before the next elections, leaving Marcos with a clearer path to securing power for his successors.

This isn’t about justice. If it were, why isn’t Marcos held accountable for the injustices of his own family’s past? Why does the ICC’s interest conveniently align with the political ambitions of the current administration? These questions expose the hypocrisy behind the case against Duterte.

Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro confirmed that the Office of the President paid for the private jet that transported former President Rodrigo Duterte to The Hague, Netherlands.

Advertisement

According to Atty. Claire Castro, this was part of the Philippine government’s full cooperation in executing the arrest. However, many question why Marcos went beyond merely following ICC orders, considering that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the Philippines. Without the Philippine government’s cooperation, it would have been difficult for the ICC to arrest Duterte—just as it has been unable to act on its cases against Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli leaders.

Atty. Reserva pointed out the inconsistency, stating, “We fight for our fellow Filipinos abroad to protect them when they face criminal charges. Yet in the case of FPRRD, he has not even been convicted in our country, and we are surrendering him just like that?”

#marcos, #bongbongmarcos, #duterte, #duterteicc, #rodrigoduterte

Advertisement

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

Ang Pagtataksil sa mga Mamamayang Pilipino: Ang Papel ni Marcos sa Pag-turnover kay Duterte sa ICC

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 12, 2025

By

Ang kamakailang pagkaka-aresto kay dating Pangulong Rodrigo Duterte ay nagdulot ng matinding kontrobersiya at nagbukas ng mga mahahalagang tanong ukol sa papel ng gobyerno ng Pilipinas, lalo na ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos, sa pakikipagtulungan sa International Criminal Court (ICC). Bagamat nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa ICC noong 2019, ang desisyon ni Marcos na ibigay si Duterte sa ICC ay itinuturing ng marami bilang isang pagtataksil sa mga mamamayang Pilipino. Dito, tatalakayin natin kung bakit ang hakbang na ito ay hindi lamang paglabag sa soberanya ng Pilipinas kundi pati na rin isang pagsuway sa mga batas ng bansa.

1️⃣ Wala nang Jurisdiksyon ang ICC sa Pilipinas

Katotohanan: Nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa ICC noong 2019.
Noong 2019, nag-withdraw ang Pilipinas mula sa International Criminal Court (ICC) matapos pagbatikos ng administrasyon ni Pangulong Duterte ang mga imbestigasyon ukol sa war on drugs. Dahil dito, wala nang legal na hurisdiksyon ang ICC sa bansa, kaya’t hindi na dapat tinanggap o pinansin ang mga arrest warrant mula sa ICC.

Ngunit sa kabila ng ito, pinili ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ibigay si Duterte sa kanila. Walang obligasyon ang Pilipinas na tanggapin o ipatupad ang arrest order mula sa ICC, ngunit ang mga hakbang ni Marcos ay nagpapakita ng pagpapahalaga sa internasyonal na presyon kaysa sa mga karapatan ng mga mamamayan ng Pilipinas.

Advertisement

2️⃣ Ang Kahilingan ni Bongbong Marcos ang Nagbigay daan sa Aresto

Katotohanan: Hindi maaaring maglabas ng warrant ang ICC nang walang kooperasyon ng isang bansa.
Ang ICC ay walang kapangyarihang pilitin ang isang bansa na arestuhin ang isang tao maliban kung ang gobyerno ng nasabing bansa ay kusang-loob na makipagtulungan. Ibig sabihin, hindi maaaring maglabas ng arrest warrant ang ICC para kay Duterte kung hindi pumayag ang gobyerno ng Pilipinas. Ang desisyon ni Marcos na ibigay si Duterte sa ICC ay isang malinaw na pagpapakita ng pagpili na makipagtulungan sa mga internasyonal na utos, at iprayoridad ang mga interes mula sa labas kaysa sa mga karapatang dapat ipagtanggol ng gobyernong Pilipino.

Ang kooperasyong ito ay hindi isang pangangailangan, kundi isang desisyon na ginawa ng Pangulo, at ipinapakita nito kung paano pinili ni Marcos ang mas malakas na internasyonal na impluwensiya kaysa sa ating mga sariling batas.

3️⃣ Pagkakaila sa Korte Suprema at mga Batas ng Pilipinas

Katotohanan: Naglabas ng Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) ang Korte Suprema.
Sa isang hakbang na tinuturing na paglabag sa rule of law, ang administrasyon ni Marcos ay nagpasya na ipagwalang-bahala ang isang Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) na inilabas ng Korte Suprema kaugnay sa aresto ni Duterte. Ang TRO na ito ay nilayon upang magbigay ng legal na proteksyon at hadlangan ang anumang padalos-dalos na aksyon, ngunit ang gobyerno ay nagpatuloy sa pag-turnover kay Duterte, pinapalampas ang proseso ng legalidad.

Ang sistema ng katarungan sa Pilipinas ay hindi pinansin, at ang desisyon na makipagtulungan sa ICC ay isang malinaw na paglabag sa ating mga sariling batas, na nagpapakita ng isang hindi tamang pagpapahalaga sa ating soberanya at kalayaan bilang isang bansa.

Advertisement

4️⃣ Isang Pagtataksil sa mga Mamamayang Pilipino

Katotohanan: Dapat ipagtanggol ng gobyerno ang mga karapatan ng mamamayan.
Sa pagpili ni Pangulong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ipasa si Duterte sa kanila, ito ay itinuturing ng marami bilang isang pagtataksil sa mga mamamayang Pilipino. Ang pangunahing tungkulin ng gobyerno ay protektahan ang mga karapatan ng mamamayan, ngunit sa pagkakataong ito, pinili nilang makipagtulungan sa ICC nang hindi tinitingnan ang ating soberanya at mga batas.

Ang hakbang na ito ay nagpapahina sa gobyerno ng Pilipinas at sistema ng katarungan, at ipinapakita na ang administrasyon ni Marcos ay mas pinahahalagahan ang internasyonal na presyon kaysa sa kaligtasan at proteksyon ng mga mamamayang Pilipino. Ang desisyon na ito ay nag-iiwan ng maraming tanong ukol sa tunay na layunin ng administrasyong ito at kung sino ang talagang nakikinabang sa desisyong ito.

🚨 Ano ang Ibig Sabihin ng Hakbang na Ito para sa Soberanya ng Pilipinas?

Ang desisyon na ipasa si Duterte sa ICC ay nagpapakita ng isang malupit na pagkawala ng soberanya para sa Pilipinas. Nagdudulot ito ng takot sa hinaharap ng ating bansa, kung saan maaaring maging karaniwan na ang gobyerno na pinamumunuan ni Pangulong Marcos ay magpapasailalim sa mga internasyonal na utos at pagpapasya nang walang malasakit sa ating mga sariling batas at interes. Ang sitwasyong ito ay isang senyales ng pagtanggi sa kapangyarihan ng ating bansa at pagpapalakas ng impluwensiya ng mga banyagang kapangyarihan sa ating mga desisyon.

👉 Dapat Magtanong ang mga Pilipino: Ano ang Nangyari sa ating Soberanya?

Dapat tanungin ng mga Pilipino: Ano ang nangyari sa ating soberanya? Bakit ang gobyerno ay mabilis na makipagtulungan sa ICC at mga banyagang requests, ngunit tahimik sa mga lokal na isyu tulad ng kurapsyon, smuggling, at krimen? Ang sitwasyong ito ay nagpapakita ng hindi tamang prayoridad ng kasalukuyang administrasyon, at ang mga mamamayan ay nararapat na magtanong kung paano makikinabang ang bansa sa desisyong ito.

Advertisement

Konklusyon:
Ang desisyon ni Pangulong Bongbong Marcos na makipagtulungan sa ICC at ipasa si dating Pangulong Duterte sa kanila ay isang malupit na paglabag sa soberanya ng Pilipinas. Pinapakita nito ang isang hindi tamang pagpapahalaga sa ating sariling mga batas at sistema ng katarungan, at isang pagsuway sa mga mamamayang Pilipino na nararapat na protektahan ng kanilang gobyerno. Dapat tanungin ng mga Pilipino ang mga tunay na motibo ng administrasyong ito at humingi ng mga sagot tungkol sa kung paano makikinabang ang bansa mula sa hakbang na ito.

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Government

The Political Motives Behind Duterte’s Arrest

mm

Published

2 years ago

on

March 11, 2025

By

The recent arrest of former President Rodrigo Duterte, under the cooperation of the Philippine government with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Interpol, has sparked controversy. While the arrest was portrayed as an act of justice, there are several reasons to believe that this is more about politics than legality. Here are five key points to consider regarding the circumstances of his arrest.

1️⃣ Interpol Has No Power to Enforce Arrests

Fact: Interpol is not a law enforcement agency.
While Interpol can issue notices, it does not have the authority to arrest individuals. Interpol’s role is purely advisory, providing information and issuing alerts to law enforcement agencies across countries. It is up to the individual governments to decide whether or not to act on these notices. The Philippine government’s decision to comply with the arrest request was a political move, not a legal obligation.

2️⃣ The ICC Has No Jurisdiction Over the Philippines

Fact: The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019.
In 2019, the Philippines officially withdrew from the International Criminal Court, meaning that the country is under no legal obligation to recognize or comply with ICC warrants. Duterte’s arrest was not a requirement but a choice made by the current administration. This decision was not based on international law but rather on political motives.

Advertisement

3️⃣ Why Was the ICC Warrant Executed “Hours Before Duterte’s Arrival”?

Fact: The timing raises questions.
If this arrest was truly about seeking justice, why was the ICC warrant issued just hours before Duterte’s arrival and executed so swiftly? In a system that values due process, there should have been a thorough legal review before such drastic measures were taken. The suspicious timing suggests that this may have been a planned political attack rather than a pursuit of justice.

4️⃣ Calling Him “Mr. Duterte” is Pure Disrespect

Fact: Titles matter in a democratic society.
Regardless of one’s political views, former presidents are entitled to be addressed with the respect their office commands. Referring to Duterte as simply “Mr. Duterte” is an intentional act of disrespect. It undermines the dignity of the office he held and exposes the current administration’s personal bias against him. Former leaders should be addressed by their titles as a matter of respect for the office, regardless of their political standing.

5️⃣ Why Comply with Foreign Requests but Ignore Real National Issues?

Fact: Selective obedience is troubling.
The Philippine government quickly complied with the ICC’s request, yet it remains silent on more pressing national issues, such as corruption, smuggling, and local crime. The government’s selective obedience raises a critical question: why is the administration so quick to act on foreign requests, but so slow to tackle real, local issues that affect the daily lives of Filipinos? This selective action only deepens the suspicion that this arrest is politically motivated, not driven by justice.

🚨 This Isn’t About Justice—It’s About Politics

The arrest of former President Duterte appears to be more about political maneuvering than a genuine pursuit of justice. The Philippine government chose to comply with foreign requests while turning a blind eye to local issues that need immediate attention. Duterte’s arrest was a decision made by the current administration, and the people of the Philippines need to question the motivations behind it.

Advertisement

👉 Filipinos Should Ask: Who Really Benefits from Duterte’s Arrest?

The true beneficiaries of this arrest are unclear, but one thing is certain—it’s definitely not the people Duterte fought to protect. Filipinos deserve to understand the political dynamics at play and the true motivations behind this high-profile arrest.

Conclusion:
The arrest of Duterte, under the guise of seeking justice, appears to be driven by political interests rather than legal necessity. Filipinos must look beyond the headlines and ask the hard questions: Why was this arrest so rushed? Why is the government prioritizing foreign directives over its own pressing issues? The answers may reveal a larger political agenda at play.

#DuterteArrest #PoliticalMotives #Philippines #ICC #Interpol #PoliticsNotJustice #SelectiveObedience #RespectForFormerLeaders #PhilippineGovernment #JusticeOrPolitics #RodrigoDuterte

Advertisement

Comments

comments

Continue Reading
Advertisement